Etchells Racing Saw New Courses with Windward Gates

March 4th, 2008 by

The Race Committee for the Etchells Mid-Winters Regatta decided to twist things up on the race course for the final weekend of the Jaguar Series. They made an amendment to the sailing instructions to allow for windward gates at the top mark, initially, gates without offset marks. At the skippers meeting, the night before racing began, the sailors had a lot of anxieties about this change. Dave Perry, author of The Racing Rules of Sailing, got up to speak about possible situations that we would see the rules come into play with the choice of the two windward marks to sail around. With nearly 90 boats, the race committee’s hope was to relieve congestion at the single windward mark and allow for more movement of positions within the fleet. Paul Elvstrom, Olympic sailing great, had introduced the concept of windward gates in the late 1960’s. The race committee posted his article and assured us that they hadn’t reinvented the wheel.

One of the many fears that the racers had was that downwind boats wouldn’t be able to see the upwind boats that had right of way on starboard or leeward, let alone get out of the way in time. In one race, this played out as two boats smashed rigs, head to head, and one boat ended up with the short end of the stick, a broken mast. The RC adjusted and added in offset marks to the gates which helped to eliminate some of the pile-ups and sticky situations.

I commend the race committee for sticking their necks out there and trying something new. It made a lot more work for them trying to keep the courses square and longer hours in the jury room to iron out the protests. Hopefully we will see the windward gates again soon, not only in Etchells fleets but others as well. Stay tuned to hear our first hand experiences with strategy and tactical thinking with this new course.

3 Responses to “Etchells Racing Saw New Courses with Windward Gates”

  1. Jos Says:

    Can you tell us anything about the protest? What was the situation leading up to the crash? You’ve made me curious!

  2. Gretchen Says:

    I am not sure about all the details, but for the race in which the incident took place, there were no offset marks around the windward gates. The boat that lost their rig was sailing downwind (not sure if port or starboard) and the boat that took down the rig was sailing upwind (again, not sure if port or starboard). I do know that the boat sailing upwind dropped out of the race that the incident took place and the boat with the broken mast received average points for the two races they missed before their rig was replaced. Knowing this, I suspect that the situation involved the upwind boat without rights or perhaps they failed to avoid the collision all together. As I hear more details regarding the crash, I will certainly feed your curiosity.

  3. Ralph Says:

    The etchellsna.org site has a number of comments on the windward gate issue. Once the offsets were included I think it worked surprisingly well. As Gretchen said the area of disturbed air and seas was much larger, but the different tactical options really opened up. It was fun to be a part of this event. I suspect, based on the success the concept had in this regatta that we will see more of it in large fleet one-design regattas.

Leave a Reply

P.O. Box 10117 Portland, Maine 04104 Tel: 207-671-7750 - Log in